hadiqat mathnavi linguistic analysis

Language and understanding of linguistic types in the works of every writer and poet is one of the most basic necessities for the recognition of that writer or poet and has an

The present study examines two valuable works of Rumi’s Masnavi and Sanaei’s Hadighat, in terms of linguistic features for two works.

Sanaei’s Hadighat as a mystical spiritual effect with a special style of linguistic and literary factors is compared with the valuable book of Rumi’s Masnavi,

and the rate of inspiration of these works from the past, as well as the linguistic innovations of both poets,

characteristics and the basis of their language’s sophistication are investigated.

In term the expression by measuring the words used in the phrases, the Sanaei’s language is more violent than Rumi’s language.

Given the fact that the foundation of both works are simile, the use of metaphor is unconscious in their language.

Trope has been used in these two works, and both poets have acted in the same way in the application of trope words. The metaphors in these works is more linguistically than literary.

Arrays such as proportionality, and contradiction, are not so artistic and apply to the use of meaning.

The telemia is more in Masnavi than Hadighat, however, due to the narrative and allegory nature of both works, the use of these arrays is very low. S

yntactically, verb diction is more common in both cases than in other cases.

In general, Masnavi’s order is smoother than Hadighat, and the movement of words is less.

There is a phonological deviation and poetry options in both works, but there is less theoretically deviation.

mystical language in the Masnavi and Hadighat has a highly textual relationship. Common terms in the Sanaei’s Hadighat have been used in Masnavi,

but in Masnavi it has been explained and interpreted more.

The repetition element in Masnavi is much more stringent than Hadighat, especially the semantic networks created by Rumi has a significant linguistic effect in this work.

But in this work, Sanai has a shorter and less repetitive language than Rumi’s Masnavi.